The touch-base. The stand-up. The check-in.

Whatever you call it, working in corporate America seems to mean a constant stream of meetings.

To make matters worse, there’s an intricate web of unspoken social rules and etiquette guiding how and when meetings are scheduled — and, it turns out, not everyone is on the same page.

A particularly contentious battleground in the discourse? The 8am meeting, both dreaded by employees and promoted by employers, per The Wall Street Journal.

But let’s back up for a second — regardless of the time, employees have a ton of meetings:

• There were ~55m meetings held in the US each week as of 2023; that’s 11m+ a day and 1B+ a year.
• American workers spent an average of 7.5 hours a week in meetings, according to a 2023 Microsoft report.

All of that time spent waving and smiling on Zoom adds up: an estimated $37B is lost each year to unproductive meetings.

Early bird not-so-special

So we know that we’re likely spending too much time in meetings, but what time of day is best for all those calls?

• Research suggests the sweet spots fall between 10am and noon if you’re looking for focus and concentration, or between 2:30pm and 3pm if the aim is high attendance.
• In 2023, 43% of meetings logged on Calendly fell between 2pm and 6pm, while 3% occurred between 8am and 9am.

Proponents of the 8am meeting often work across global time zones and, if they’re lucky, can take that first morning call from home.

The remaining majority of workers hate the early morning meeting for a slew of fair reasons; it can interfere with those little things like sleep, child care, working out, and eating.

Scroll to the bottom to let us know where you fall in this debate, but we’ll just put it out there now: Don’t you dare put an 8am on our calendars.

Most people today have “Candy Crush” or some other mobile game on their phones if, at the very least, to pass the time on the subway or at the DMV.

But back when phones were phones and gaming consoles were gaming consoles, Nokia unsuccessfully tried to combine the two into one monstrosity that came to be known as…

… the taco phone

Nokia released N-Gage in October 2003 as a competitor to the Game Boy Advance, Nintendo’s handheld console. The idea was that consumers would enjoy a console that doubled as a phone and an MP3 player, plus users could game with friends over cell or Bluetooth networks.

That idea was solid; the mobile gaming industry is expected to generate $98.7B+ in 2024.

But the N-Gage just didn’t work. It was shaped like a taco, which led to much ridicule. Beyond that:

• Users had to remove the phone’s battery to insert game cartridges.
• It also had to be disassembled again to use an MP3 player, which required another memory card that wasn’t included.
• To use it as a phone, users had to hold it sideways, which looked very silly.
• The buttons were clunky when gaming.
• The phone was expensive at the time, retailing for $300 (~$500 today) — not including games.

Less than a month after launch, retailers including GameStop had slashed $100 off the price.

By 2005, Nokia admitted the N-Gage was not a winner, despite a better-designed 2004 version that also failed to take off.

Nokia continued to produce games through its N-Gage gaming platform through 2009, shuffling customers instead to its now-defunct Ovi app store.

BTW: Everyone knows Nokia’s best game was “Snake.” It debuted in 1997, and nostalgic fans can still play this online version.